| Title |
On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, November 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026380825208 |
| Authors |
David Sloan Wilson, Eric Dietrich, Anne B. Clark |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 94 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 32 | 28% |
| Unknown | 6 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 24% |
| Psychology | 23 | 20% |
| Philosophy | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,894,511
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#156
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,467
of 53,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them