| Title |
Evaluating Alternative Explanations in Ecosystem Experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, July 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100219900025 |
| Authors |
Stephen R. Carpenter, Jonathan J. Cole, Timothy E. Essington, James R. Hodgson, Jeffrey N. Houser, James F. Kitchell, Michael L. Pace |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Professor | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#635
of 1,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,106
of 33,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.