↓ Skip to main content

From human-centred to human-context centred approach: looking back over ‘the hills’, what has been gained and lost?

Overview of attention for article published in AI & SOCIETY, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
From human-centred to human-context centred approach: looking back over ‘the hills’, what has been gained and lost?
Published in
AI & SOCIETY, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00146-007-0088-3
Authors

Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 27%
Engineering 9 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Design 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,427,897
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from AI & SOCIETY
#429
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,750
of 79,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AI & SOCIETY
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.