↓ Skip to main content

A combined diffusion tensor imaging and Ki-67 labeling index study for evaluating the extent of tumor infiltration using the F98 rat glioma model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
A combined diffusion tensor imaging and Ki-67 labeling index study for evaluating the extent of tumor infiltration using the F98 rat glioma model
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-017-2734-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Wang, Tingting Ha, Xuzhu Chen, Shaowu Li, Lin Ai, Jun Ma, Jianping Dai

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been proven to be a sophisticated and useful tool for the delineation of tumors. In the present study, we investigated the predictive role of DTI compared to other magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in combination with Ki-67 labeling index in defining tumor cell infiltration in the peritumoral regions of F98 glioma-bearing rats. A total of 29 tumor-bearing Fischer rats underwent T2-weighted imaging, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, and DTI of their brain using a 7.0-T MRI scanner. The fractional anisotropy (FA) ratios were correlated to the Ki-67 labeling index using the Spearman correlation analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was established to evaluate parameters with sensitivity and specificity in order to identify the threshold values for predicting tumor infiltration. Significant correlations were observed between the FA ratios and Ki-67 labeling index (r = - 0.865, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis demonstrated that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and FA ratios could predict 50% of the proliferating cells in the regions of interest (ROI), with a sensitivity of 88.1 and 81.3%, and a specificity of 86.2 and 90.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the two ratios could also predict 10% of the proliferating cells in the ROI, with a sensitivity of 82.5 and 94.9%, and a specificity of 100 and 88.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The present study demonstrated that the FA ratios are closely correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index. Furthermore, both ADC and FA ratios, derived from DTI, were useful for quantitatively predicting the Ki-67 labeling of glioma cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,587
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,057
of 442,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#77
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,987 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.