↓ Skip to main content

Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10552-006-0057-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie A. Navarro Silvera, Thomas E. Rohan

Abstract

Worldwide, there are more than 10 million new cancer cases each year, and cancer is the cause of approximately 12% of all deaths. Given this, a large number of epidemiologic studies have been undertaken to identify potential risk factors for cancer, amongst which the association with trace elements has received considerable attention. Trace elements, such as selenium, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, and nickel, are found naturally in the environment, and human exposure derives from a variety of sources, including air, drinking water, and food. Trace elements are of particular interest given that the levels of exposure to them are potentially modifiable. In this review, we focus largely on the association between each of the trace elements noted above and risk of cancers of the lung, breast, colorectum, prostate, urinary bladder, and stomach. Overall, the evidence currently available appears to support an inverse association between selenium exposure and prostate cancer risk, and possibly also a reduction in risk with respect to lung cancer, although additional prospective studies are needed. There is also limited evidence for an inverse association between zinc and breast cancer, and again, prospective studies are needed to confirm this. Most studies have reported no association between selenium and risk of breast, colorectal, and stomach cancer, and between zinc and prostate cancer risk. There is compelling evidence in support of positive associations between arsenic and risk of both lung and bladder cancers, and between cadmium and lung cancer risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Chemistry 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 49 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,984
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,800
of 165,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.