↓ Skip to main content

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: results and open issues

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: results and open issues
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11739-007-0002-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Bencardino, M. Manzoni, S. Delfanti, A. Riccardi, M. Danova, G. R. Corazza

Abstract

The medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has progressively changed since the introduction of "targeted therapy". The development of one of these molecular drug categories, e. g., the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase (TK) selective inhibitors, such as the orally active gefitinib and erlotinib, offers an interesting new opportunity. The clinical response rates obtained with their employment in unselected patient populations only account for approximately 10%. Because of this, over the last two years numerous studies have been performed in order to identify the patient subsets that could better benefit from these agents. Not only patient characteristics and clinical-pathological features, such as never-smoking status, female gender, East Asian origin, adenocarcinoma histology, bronchioloalveolar subtype, but also molecular findings, such as somatic mutations in the EGFR gene, emerge as potentially useful prognostic and predictive factors in advanced NSCLC. Further, specifically designed clinical trials are still needed to completely clarify these and other open issues that are reviewed in this paper, in order to clarify all the interesting findings available in the clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 30%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#369
of 937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,219
of 77,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.