You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12435 |
| Authors |
Katharina Schulze, Kathryn Knights, Lauren Coad, Jonas Geldmann, Fiona Leverington, April Eassom, Melitta Marr, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Marc Hockings, Neil D. Burgess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 14% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Denmark | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 60% |
| Scientists | 34 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 510 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 16% |
| Researcher | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 16% |
| Unknown | 130 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 150 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Unknown | 157 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#525,823
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#183
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,589
of 471,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.