↓ Skip to main content

Skin deep: from dermal fibroblasts to pancreatic beta cells

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Skin deep: from dermal fibroblasts to pancreatic beta cells
Published in
Immunologic Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12026-014-8546-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gohar S. Manzar, Eun-Mi Kim, Pavana Rotti, Nicholas Zavazava

Abstract

Type I diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease caused by pancreatic β-cell destruction induced by autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells. After significant reduction of the β-cell mass, diabetes sets in and can cause significant complications. It is estimated that more than 3 million Americans have T1D, and its prevalence among young individuals is progressively rising; however, the reasons for this increase are not known. Islet transplantation is recognized as the ultimate cure for T1D, but unfortunately, the severe scarcity of available islets makes it necessary to establish alternative sources of β-cells. Our lab seeks to establish human-induced pluripotent stem cells as an unlimited, novel source of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) that are patient-specific, obviating the requirement for immunosuppression. Although several reports have emerged demonstrating successful derivation of IPCs from human pluripotent stem cells, the efficiencies of derivation are inadequate and these IPCs do not respond to glucose stimulation in vitro. We reasoned that the use of a growth factor sequestering bioscaffold and promotion of cell-cell signaling through 3D clustering would enhance the generation of functionally superior IPCs compared to those derived by 2D differentiation. Here, we discuss a novel 3D platform for the generation of highly efficient human IPCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 40%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,321,901
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#497
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,040
of 227,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.