↓ Skip to main content

Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
700 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
560 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0560-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Lizio, Jayson Harshbarger, Hisashi Shimoji, Jessica Severin, Takeya Kasukawa, Serkan Sahin, Imad Abugessaisa, Shiro Fukuda, Fumi Hori, Sachi Ishikawa-Kato, Christopher J Mungall, Erik Arner, J Kenneth Baillie, Nicolas Bertin, Hidemasa Bono, Michiel de Hoon, Alexander D Diehl, Emmanuel Dimont, Tom C Freeman, Kaori Fujieda, Winston Hide, Rajaram Kaliyaperumal, Toshiaki Katayama, Timo Lassmann, Terrence F Meehan, Koro Nishikata, Hiromasa Ono, Michael Rehli, Albin Sandelin, Erik A Schultes, Peter AC ‘t Hoen, Zuotian Tatum, Mark Thompson, Tetsuro Toyoda, Derek W Wright, Carsten O Daub, Masayoshi Itoh, Piero Carninci, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Alistair RR Forrest, Hideya Kawaji, the FANTOM consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 543 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 22%
Researcher 95 17%
Student > Master 78 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 7%
Other 86 15%
Unknown 90 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 162 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 8%
Computer Science 33 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 3%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 102 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,075,375
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#774
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,905
of 358,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#16
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.