↓ Skip to main content

In defence of the slim dodo: a reply to Louchart and Mourer-Chauviré

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
In defence of the slim dodo: a reply to Louchart and Mourer-Chauviré
Published in
The Science of Nature, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00114-011-0772-5
Authors

Delphine Angst, Eric Buffetaut, Anick Abourachid

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
France 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Other 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 60%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 15%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#817
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,098
of 111,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.