↓ Skip to main content

Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer: where are we now?

Overview of attention for article published in Oncology Reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer: where are we now?
Published in
Oncology Reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12156-011-0074-3
Authors

Lakshmi Chintala, Susmitha Vaka, Joaquina Baranda, Stephen K. Williamson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Oncology Reviews
#22
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,890
of 108,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them