↓ Skip to main content

Predicting similarity judgments in intertemporal choice with machine learning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Predicting similarity judgments in intertemporal choice with machine learning
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1398-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey R. Stevens, Leen-Kiat Soh

Abstract

Similarity models of intertemporal choice are heuristics that choose based on similarity judgments of the reward amounts and time delays. Yet, we do not know how these judgments are made. Here, we use machine-learning algorithms to assess what factors predict similarity judgments and whether decision trees capture the judgment outcomes and process. We find that combining small and large values into numerical differences and ratios and arranging them in tree-like structures can predict both similarity judgments and response times. Our results suggest that we can use machine learning to not only model decision outcomes but also model how decisions are made. Revealing how people make these important judgments may be useful in developing interventions to help them make better decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 33%
Engineering 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%