↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
patent
12 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
531 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00228-008-0553-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger K. Verbeeck

Abstract

The liver plays a central role in the pharmacokinetics of the majority of drugs. Liver dysfunction may not only reduce the blood/plasma clearance of drugs eliminated by hepatic metabolism or biliary excretion, it can also affect plasma protein binding, which in turn could influence the processes of distribution and elimination. Portal-systemic shunting, which is common in advanced liver cirrhosis, may substantially decrease the presystemic elimination (i.e., first-pass effect) of high extraction drugs following their oral administration, thus leading to a significant increase in the extent of absorption. Chronic liver diseases are associated with variable and non-uniform reductions in drug-metabolizing activities. For example, the activity of the various CYP450 enzymes seems to be differentially affected in patients with cirrhosis. Glucuronidation is often considered to be affected to a lesser extent than CYP450-mediated reactions in mild to moderate cirrhosis but can also be substantially impaired in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Patients with advanced cirrhosis often have impaired renal function and dose adjustment may, therefore, also be necessary for drugs eliminated by renal exctretion. In addition, patients with liver cirrhosis are more sensitive to the central adverse effects of opioid analgesics and the renal adverse effects of NSAIDs. In contrast, a decreased therapeutic effect has been noted in cirrhotic patients with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and certain diuretics. Unfortunately, there is no simple endogenous marker to predict hepatic function with respect to the elimination capacity of specific drugs. Several quantitative liver tests that measure the elimination of marker substrates such as galactose, sorbitol, antipyrine, caffeine, erythromycin, and midazolam, have been developed and evaluated, but no single test has gained widespread clinical use to adjust dosage regimens for drugs in patients with hepatic dysfunction. The semi-quantitative Child-Pugh score is frequently used to assess the severity of liver function impairment, but only offers the clinician rough guidance for dosage adjustment because it lacks the sensitivity to quantitate the specific ability of the liver to metabolize individual drugs. The recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) to study the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of drugs under development is clearly aimed at generating, if possible, specific dosage recommendations for patients with hepatic dysfunction. However, the limitations of the Child-Pugh score are acknowledged, and further research is needed to develop more sensitive liver function tests to guide drug dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 331 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Other 23 7%
Other 75 22%
Unknown 95 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 70 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 106 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,120,258
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#53
of 2,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,370
of 95,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.