↓ Skip to main content

An attelabid weevil (Euops splendida) cultivates fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, December 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
An attelabid weevil (Euops splendida) cultivates fungi
Published in
Journal of Ethology, December 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02350306
Authors

Kazuhiko Sakurai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 64%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#180
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,036
of 42,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them