↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive traits of Pinus halepensis in the light of fire – a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive traits of Pinus halepensis in the light of fire – a critical review
Published in
Plant Ecology, March 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:vege.0000029380.04821.99
Authors

Gidi Ne'eman, Shirrinka Goubitz, Ran Nathan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 3%
Israel 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Turkey 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 158 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 41%
Environmental Science 59 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#294
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,398
of 63,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.