↓ Skip to main content

The niche concept: Suggestions for its use in human ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, April 1975
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The niche concept: Suggestions for its use in human ecology
Published in
Human Ecology, April 1975
DOI 10.1007/bf01552263
Authors

Donald L. Hardesty

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Environmental Science 12 14%
Arts and Humanities 9 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#334
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,078
of 4,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them