| Title |
Statistical simulations of the future 50-year statistics of cold-tongue El Niño and warm-pool El Niño
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13143-011-0011-1 |
| Authors |
Hanna Na, Bong-Geun Jang, Won-Moon Choi, Kwang-Yul Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,967
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
#20
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,833
of 113,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them