↓ Skip to main content

Wood ash residue causes a mixture of growth promotion and toxicity in Lemna minor

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wood ash residue causes a mixture of growth promotion and toxicity in Lemna minor
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas S. Jagodzinski, Marian T. O'Donoghue, Liam B. Heffernan, Frank N.A.M. van Pelt, John O'Halloran, Marcel A.K. Jansen

Abstract

The use of wood as a sustainable biofuel results in the generation of residual wood ash. The ash contains high amounts of plant macronutrients such as phosphorus, potassium, calcium as well as several micronutrients. To explore the potential use of wood ash as a fertiliser, the growth enhancing properties of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong.) wood ash were contrasted with the potential toxic action, using common duckweed (Lemna minor L.) as a model test species. The growth of L. minor exposed to wood bottom and fly ash solids and corresponding leachates was assessed in ultra-oligotrophic and eutrophic media. Ash solids and leachates were also tested as neutralized preparations. Suspended ash solids promoted L. minor growth up to concentrations of 2.5-5g/L. Leachates promoted growth up to 10g ash equivalents per litre, but for bottom ash only. Beneficial effects of wood ash were most pronounced on ultra-oligotrophic medium. However, on such nutrient-deficient medium severe inhibition of L. minor biomass and frond growth was observed at relatively low concentrations of fly ash (EC50=14g/L). On standard, eutrophic medium, higher concentrations of fly ash (EC50=21g/L), or neutralized fly ash (EC50=37g/L) were required to impede growth. Bottom ash, or neutralized bottom ash retarded growth at concentrations of 51g/L and 74g/L (EC50), respectively, in eutrophic medium. It appears that phytotoxicity is due to the elemental composition of the ash, its alkaline character, and possible interactions between these two properties. Growth promotion was due to the substantial content of plant nutrients. This study underlines the importance of the receiving environment (nutrient status and pH) in determining the balance between toxicity and growth promotion, and shows that the margin between growth promoting and toxicity inducing concentrations can be enlarged through ash neutralization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Engineering 5 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,760,807
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#11,879
of 30,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,241
of 454,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#201
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.