↓ Skip to main content

Gut Homing Receptors on CD8 T Cells Are Retinoic Acid Dependent and Not Maintained by Liver Dendritic or Stellate Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut Homing Receptors on CD8 T Cells Are Retinoic Acid Dependent and Not Maintained by Liver Dendritic or Stellate Cells
Published in
Gastroenterology, February 2009
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bertus Eksteen, J. Rodrigo Mora, Emma L. Haughton, Neil C. Henderson, Laura Lee–Turner, Eduardo J. Villablanca, Stuart M. Curbishley, Alex I. Aspinall, Ulrich H. von Andrian, David H. Adams

Abstract

Lymphocytes primed by intestinal dendritic cells (DC) express the gut-homing receptors CCR9 and alpha4beta7, which recognize CCL25 and mucosal addressin cell-adhesion molecule-1 in the intestine promoting the development of regional immunity. In mice, imprinting of CCR9 and alpha4beta7 is dependent on retinoic acid during T-cell activation. Tissue specificity is lost in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), an extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease, when ectopic expression of mucosal addressin cell-adhesion molecule-1 and CCL25 in the liver promotes recruitment of CCR9+alpha4beta7+ T cells to the liver. We investigated the processes that control enterohepatic T-cell migration and whether the ability to imprint CCR9 and alpha4beta7 is restricted to intestinal DCs or can under some circumstances be acquired by hepatic DCs in diseases such as PSC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 90 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#5,632
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,687
of 109,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#28
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.