↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Acoustic Environment on Tinnitus Behavior in Sound-Exposed Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Acoustic Environment on Tinnitus Behavior in Sound-Exposed Rats
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10162-017-0651-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aikeen Jones, Bradford J. May

Abstract

Laboratory studies often rely on a damaging sound exposure to induce tinnitus in animal models. Because the time course and ultimate success of the induction process is not known in advance, it is not unusual to maintain sound-exposed animals for months while they are periodically assessed for behavioral indications of the disorder. To demonstrate the importance of acoustic environment during this period of behavioral screening, sound-exposed rats were tested for tinnitus while housed under quiet or constant noise conditions. More than half of the quiet-housed rats developed behavioral indications of the disorder. None of the noise-housed rats exhibited tinnitus behavior during 2 months of behavioral screening. It is widely assumed that the "phantom sound" of tinnitus reflects abnormal levels of spontaneous activity in the central auditory pathways that are triggered by cochlear injury. Our results suggest that sustained patterns of noise-driven activity may prevent the injury-induced changes in central auditory processing that lead to this hyperactive state. From the perspective of laboratory studies of tinnitus, housing sound-exposed animals in uncontrolled noise levels may significantly reduce the success of induction procedures. From a broader clinical perspective, an early intervention with sound therapy may reduce the risk of tinnitus in individuals who have experienced an acute cochlear injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Engineering 3 14%
Psychology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#380
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,650
of 446,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.