↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Short Isoform of Cytosolic PSD-95 Interactor (Cypin) Regulates Neuronal Development

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A Novel Short Isoform of Cytosolic PSD-95 Interactor (Cypin) Regulates Neuronal Development
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0849-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihir V. Patel, Przemyslaw Swiatkowski, Munjin Kwon, Ana R. Rodriguez, Keith Campagno, Bonnie L. Firestein

Abstract

The guanine deaminase cypin (cytosolic PSD-95 interactor) binds to PSD-95 (postsynaptic density protein 95) and regulates dendrite branching by promoting microtubule polymerization. Here, we identify a novel short isoform of cypin, termed cypinS, which is expressed in mouse and human, but not rat, tissues. Cypin and cypinS mRNA and protein levels peak at P7 and P14 in the mouse brain, suggesting a role for these isoforms during development. Interestingly, although cypinS lacks guanine deaminase activity, overexpression of cypinS increases dendrite branching. This increase occurs further away from soma than do increases resulting from overexpression of cypin. In contrast, overexpression of cypin, but not cypinS, decreases dendritic spine density and maturity. This suggests that changes to spines, but not to dendrites, may be dependent on guanine deaminase activity. Furthermore, overexpression of either cypin or cypinS increases miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequency, pointing to a presynaptic role for both isoforms. Interestingly, overexpression of cypinS results in a significantly greater increase in frequency than does overexpression of cypin. Thus, cypin and cypinS play distinct roles in neuronal development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,819
of 3,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,057
of 442,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#66
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.