↓ Skip to main content

Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
14 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
2656 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders
Published in
The Lancet, March 2005
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71142-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Joanna Baxter, Linda M Scott, Peter J Campbell, Clare East, Nasios Fourouclas, Soheila Swanton, George S Vassiliou, Anthony J Bench, Elaine M Boyd, Natasha Curtin, Mike A Scott, Wendy N Erber, the Cancer Genome Project, Anthony R Green

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 494 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 82 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 16%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Student > Master 45 9%
Other 30 6%
Other 75 15%
Unknown 134 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 4%
Chemistry 10 2%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 143 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,670,351
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#11,185
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,424
of 79,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#34
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.