| Title |
Experimental petrology of alkalic lavas: constraints on cotectics of multiple saturation in natural basic liquids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, May 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00375521 |
| Authors |
Richard O. Sack, David Walker, Ian S. E. Carmichael |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 33% |
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 77% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#185
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,465
of 12,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them