↓ Skip to main content

Replication-dependent size reduction precedes differentiation in Chlamydia trachomatis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replication-dependent size reduction precedes differentiation in Chlamydia trachomatis
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02432-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer K. Lee, Germán A. Enciso, Daniela Boassa, Christopher N. Chander, Tracy H. Lou, Sean S. Pairawan, Melody C. Guo, Frederic Y. M. Wan, Mark H. Ellisman, Christine Sütterlin, Ming Tan

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of bacterial sexually transmitted infection. It produces an unusual intracellular infection in which a vegetative form, called the reticulate body (RB), replicates and then converts into an elementary body (EB), which is the infectious form. Here we use quantitative three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D EM) to show that C. trachomatis RBs divide by binary fission and undergo a sixfold reduction in size as the population expands. Conversion only occurs after at least six rounds of replication, and correlates with smaller RB size. These results suggest that RBs only convert into EBs below a size threshold, reached by repeatedly dividing before doubling in size. A stochastic mathematical model shows how replication-dependent RB size reduction produces delayed and asynchronous conversion, which are hallmarks of the Chlamydia developmental cycle. Our findings support a model in which RB size controls the timing of RB-to-EB conversion without the need for an external signal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 15 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,341,283
of 25,204,906 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,025
of 55,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,547
of 455,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#650
of 1,297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.