| Title |
Atlas-Based Computational Analysis of Heart Shape and Function in Congenital Heart Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12265-017-9778-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Gilbert, Nickolas Forsch, Sanjeet Hegde, Charlene Mauger, Jeffrey H. Omens, James C. Perry, Beau Pontré, Avan Suinesiaputra, Alistair A. Young, Andrew D. McCulloch |
| Abstract |
Approximately 1% of all babies are born with some form of congenital heart defect. Many serious forms of CHD can now be surgically corrected after birth, which has led to improved survival into adulthood. However, many patients require serial monitoring to evaluate progression of heart failure and determine timing of interventions. Accurate multidimensional quantification of regional heart shape and function is required for characterizing these patients. A computational atlas of single ventricle and biventricular heart shape and function enables quantification of remodeling in terms of z scores in relation to specific reference populations. Progression of disease can then be monitored effectively by longitudinal evaluation of z scores. A biomechanical analysis of cardiac function in relation to population variation enables investigation of the underlying mechanisms for developing pathology. Here, we summarize recent progress in this field, with examples in single ventricle and biventricular congenital pathologies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,228,656
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#198
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,214
of 442,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.