| Title |
David Rentz: A guide to the katydids of Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-010-9312-4 |
| Authors |
Tim R. New |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#264
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,802
of 94,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.