↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid burden and incident depressive symptoms in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amyloid burden and incident depressive symptoms in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Perin, Karra D. Harrington, Yen Ying Lim, Kathryn Ellis, David Ames, Robert H. Pietrzak, Adrian Schembri, Stephanie Rainey-Smith, Olivier Salvado, Simon M. Laws, Ralph N. Martins, Victor L. Villemagne, Christopher C. Rowe, Colin L. Masters, Paul Maruff, for the AIBL research group

Abstract

Relationships between depression and Alzheimer's disease (AD) may become clearer if studied in preclinical AD where dementia is not present. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively, relationships between brain amyloid-β (Aβ), depressive symptoms and screen positive depression in cognitively normal (CN) older adults. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Geriatric Depression Inventory (GDS-15) in CN adults from the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study without depression at baseline and classified as having abnormally high (Aβ+; n = 136) or low (Aβ-; n = 449) Aβ according to positron emission tomography at 18-month intervals over 72 months. Incident cases of screen positive depression were not increased in Aβ+ CN adults although small increases in overall depressive symptoms severity (d = - 0.25; 95% CI, - 0.45, - 0.05) and apathy-anxiety symptoms (d = - 0.28; 95% CI - 0.48, - 0.08) were. As the AIBL sample is an experimental sample, no individuals had severe medical illnesses or significant psychiatric disorders. Additionally, individuals who had evidence of screen-positive depression at screening were excluded from enrolment in the AIBL study. Thus, the current data can be considered only as providing a foundation for understanding relationships between Aβ and depression in preclinical AD. These results suggest that the presence of a depressive disorder or even increased depressive symptoms are themselves unlikely to be a direct consequence of increasing Aβ. New depressive disorders presenting in CN older adults could therefore be investigated for aetiologies beyond AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Psychology 12 14%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 35 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#7,748
of 10,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,040
of 450,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#134
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.