↓ Skip to main content

Social and mating system of cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburras (Dacelo novaeguineae)

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Social and mating system of cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburras (Dacelo novaeguineae)
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002650050659
Authors

S. Legge, A. Cockburn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 74%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,459
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.