↓ Skip to main content

Review of the nature, diversity and structure of bacteriophage receptor binding proteins that target Gram-positive bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 799)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Review of the nature, diversity and structure of bacteriophage receptor binding proteins that target Gram-positive bacteria
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0382-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed S. A. Dowah, Martha R. J. Clokie

Abstract

As the importance of bacteriophages as novel antimicrobials and potential diagnostics comes increasingly into focus, there is a heightened interest in understanding the mechanisms of how they interact with their bacterial hosts. The first step of a bacteriophage (phage) infection is the recognition of specific moieties on the bacterial cell surface as determined by their phage receptor binding proteins (RBPs). Knowledge of RBPs and how they interact with bacteria has been driven by studies of model phages and of industrially important phages, such as those that impact the dairy industry. Therefore, data from these phage groups constitute the majority of this review. We start with a brief introduction to phages, their life cycles and known receptors. We then review the state-of-the-art knowledge of phage RBPs of Gram-positive bacteria in the context of the better understood Gram-negative bacterial RBPs. In general, more is known about the RBPs of siphoviruses than myoviruses, which is reflected here, but for both virus families, where possible, we show what RBPs are, how they are arranged within phage genomes and what is known about their structures. As RBPs are the key determinant of phage specificity, studying and characterising them is important, for downstream applications such as diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Student > Master 30 12%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 86 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 12%
Engineering 7 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 94 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,705,956
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#35
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,408
of 442,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.