↓ Skip to main content

The shifting perception on antioxidants: The case of vitamin E and β-carotene

Overview of attention for article published in Redox Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The shifting perception on antioxidants: The case of vitamin E and β-carotene
Published in
Redox Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misha F. Vrolijk, Antoon Opperhuizen, Eugène H.J.M. Jansen, Roger W. Godschalk, Frederik J. Van Schooten, Aalt Bast, Guido R.M.M. Haenen

Abstract

Antioxidants are vital for aerobic life, and for decades the expectations of antioxidants as health promoting agents were very high. However, relatively recent meta-analyses of clinical studies show that supplementation of antioxidants does not result in the presumed health benefit, but is associated with increased mortality. The dilemma that still needs to be solved is: what are antioxidants in the end, healthy or toxic? We have evaluated this dilemma by examining the presumed health effects of two individual antioxidants with opposite images i.e. the "poisonous" β-carotene and the "wholesome" vitamin E and focused on one aspect, namely their role in inducing BPDE-DNA adducts. It appears that both antioxidants promote DNA adduct formation indirectly by inhibition of the protective enzyme glutathione-S-transferase π (GST π). Despite their opposite image, both antioxidants display a similar type of toxicity. It is concluded that, in the appreciation of antioxidants, first their benefits should be identified and substantiated by elucidating their molecular mechanism. Subsequently, the risks should be identified including the molecular mechanism. The optimal benefit-risk ratio has to be determined for each antioxidant and each individual separately, also considering the dose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 186 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 19%
Student > Master 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Chemistry 10 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 57 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,615,074
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Redox Biology
#277
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,448
of 360,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Redox Biology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.