↓ Skip to main content

Development of a new water sterilization device with a 365 nm UV-LED

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 2,053)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Development of a new water sterilization device with a 365 nm UV-LED
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11517-007-0263-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirei Mori, Akiko Hamamoto, Akira Takahashi, Masayuki Nakano, Noriko Wakikawa, Satoko Tachibana, Toshitaka Ikehara, Yutaka Nakaya, Masatake Akutagawa, Yohsuke Kinouchi

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is an effective disinfection method. In sterilization equipment, a low-pressure mercury lamp emitting an effective germicidal UVC (254 nm) is used as the light source. However, the lamp, which contains mercury, must be disposed of at the end of its lifetime or following damage due to physical shock or vibration. We investigated the suitability of an ultraviolet light-emitting diode at an output wavelength of 365 nm (UVA-LED) as a sterilization device, comparing with the other wavelength irradiation such as 254 nm (a low-pressure mercury lam) and 405 nm (LED). We used a commercially available UVA-LED that emitted light at the shortest wavelength and at the highest output energy. The new sterilization system using the UVA-LED was able to inactivate bacteria, such as Escherichia coli DH5 alpha, Enteropathogenic E. coli, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. The inactivations of the bacteria were dependent on the accumulation of UVA irradiation. Taking advantage of the safety and compact size of LED devices, we expect that the UVA-LED sterilization device can be developed as a new type of water sterilization device.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 53 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Physics and Astronomy 10 5%
Materials Science 9 5%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,863,707
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#21
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,111
of 90,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them