↓ Skip to main content

The classification of the generic segregates of Phrygilanthus (= Notanthera) of the Loranthaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Brittonia, January 1973
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The classification of the generic segregates of Phrygilanthus (= Notanthera) of the Loranthaceae
Published in
Brittonia, January 1973
DOI 10.2307/2805488
Authors

B. A. Barlow, D. Wiens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 81%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brittonia
#81
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,504
of 17,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brittonia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them