↓ Skip to main content

Risk compensation in HIV prevention: Implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Risk compensation in HIV prevention: Implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11904-007-0024-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Eaton, Seth C. Kalichman

Abstract

Studies investigating the effects of biologic HIV prevention technologies have been reported with promising results for slowing the spread of the disease. Although they can reduce the rate of HIV transmission at varying levels of efficaciousness, it is vital to anticipate their impact on subsequent sexual behaviors. Risk homeostasis theory posits that decreases in perceived risk, which will occur with access to HIV prevention technologies, will correspond with increases in risk-taking behavior. Here we review the literature on risk compensation in response to HIV vaccines, topical microbicides, antiretroviral medications, and male circumcision. Behavioral risk compensation is evident in response to prevention technologies that are used in advance of HIV exposure and at minimal personal cost. We conclude that behavioral risk compensation should be addressed by implementing adjunct behavioral risk-reduction interventions to avoid negating the preventive benefits of biomedical HIV prevention technologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 27%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 30%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,384,791
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#193
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,929
of 90,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.