↓ Skip to main content

The NMDA receptor glycine modulatory site: a therapeutic target for improving cognition and reducing negative symptoms in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The NMDA receptor glycine modulatory site: a therapeutic target for improving cognition and reducing negative symptoms in schizophrenia
Published in
Psychopharmacology, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00213-003-1709-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph T. Coyle, Guochuan Tsai

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies demonstrate that subanaesthetic doses of dissociative anaesthetics, which are non-competitive antagonists at the NMDA receptor, replicate in normal subjects the cognitive impairments, negative symptoms and brain functional abnormalities of schizophrenia. Post-mortem and genetic studies have identified several abnormalities associated with schizophrenia that would interfere with the activation of the glycine modulatory site on the NMDA receptor. Placebo controlled clinical trials with agents that directly or indirectly activate the glycine modulatory site consistently reduce negative symptoms and frequently improve cognition in patients with chronic schizophrenia, who are receiving concurrent typical antipsychotics. Thus, there is convincing evidence that the glycine modulatory site on the NMDA receptor is a valid therapeutic target for improving cognition and associated negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 133 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 19%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,987,747
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,749
of 5,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,756
of 132,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.