↓ Skip to main content

An Oral Disease Severity Score validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Oral Disease Severity Score validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, April 2018
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16265
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Ormond, H. McParland, A.N.A. Donaldson, M. Andiappan, R.J. Cook, M. Escudier, E. Hullah, J. Higham, R. McMillan, J. Taylor, P.J. Shirlaw, S.J. Challacombe, J.F. Setterfield

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to validate the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) for the assessment of oral involvement in pemphigus vulgaris (PV). A secondary aim was to compare the inter - intra- observer variability and ease of use with the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the oral scoring methods used in Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI). 15 patients with mild to moderately severe oral PV were scored for disease severity by 10 oral medicine clinicians using the ODSS, PGA and the oral sections of ABSIS and PDAI. Two clinicians re-scored all patients after a minimum two-hour interval. Inter-observer reliability was assessed using an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). For the ODSS total score the ICC was 0.83, PDAI (oral total activity) 0.79 ABSIS (oral total) 0.71 and PGA was 0.7. Intra-observer agreement between initial scoring and re-scoring of the same subject by two clinicians demonstrated an ICC for each of 0.97 and 0.96 for ODSS total score; 0.99 and 0.82 for the PDAI oral activity; 0.86 and 0.45 for the ABSIS total and 0.99 and 0.64 for the PGA. Convergent validity was good with a correlation coefficient of greater than 0.5 (p<0.0001). The mean time (SD) (seconds) taken to complete each scoring method was: ODSS 76±37; PDAI 117±16; ABSIS 75±19. This study has validated the ODSS for the assessment of oral PV. It has shown superior inter- and intra-observer reliability to PDAI, ABSIS and PGA and is quick to perform. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#7,751
of 9,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,245
of 340,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#169
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.