↓ Skip to main content

Identification of large-scale human-specific copy number differences by inter-species array comparative genomic hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Identification of large-scale human-specific copy number differences by inter-species array comparative genomic hybridization
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00439-005-0130-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Violaine Goidts, Lluis Armengol, Werner Schempp, Jeffrey Conroy, Norma Nowak, Stefan Müller, David N. Cooper, Xavier Estivill, Wolfgang Enard, Justyna M. Szamalek, Horst Hameister, Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki

Abstract

Copy number differences (CNDs), and the concomitant differences in gene number, have contributed significantly to the genomic divergence between humans and other primates. To assess its relative importance, the genomes of human, common chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan and macaque were compared by comparative genomic hybridization using a high-resolution human BAC array (aCGH). In an attempt to avoid potential interference from frequent intra-species polymorphism, pooled DNA samples were used from each species. A total of 322 sites of large-scale inter-species CND were identified. Most CNDs were lineage-specific but frequencies differed considerably between the lineages; the highest CND frequency among hominoids was observed in gorilla. The conserved nature of the orangutan genome has already been noted by karyotypic studies and our findings suggest that this degree of conservation may extend to the sub-microscopic level. Of the 322 CND sites identified, 14 human lineage-specific gains were observed. Most of these human-specific copy number gains span regions previously identified as segmental duplications (SDs) and our study demonstrates that SDs are major sites of CND between the genomes of humans and other primates. Four of the human-specific CNDs detected by aCGH map close to the breakpoints of human-specific karyotypic changes [e.g., the human-specific inversion of chromosome 1 and the polymorphic inversion inv(2)(p11.2q13)], suggesting that human-specific duplications may have predisposed to chromosomal rearrangement. The association of human-specific copy number gains with chromosomal breakpoints emphasizes their potential importance in mediating karyotypic evolution as well as in promoting human genomic diversity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,697,449
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#955
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,888
of 156,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.