↓ Skip to main content

Structural MRI studies of language function in the undamaged brain

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Structural MRI studies of language function in the undamaged brain
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00429-009-0211-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M. Richardson, Cathy J. Price

Abstract

In recent years, the demonstration that structural changes can occur in the human brain beyond those associated with development, ageing and neuropathology has revealed a new approach to studying the neural basis of behaviour. In this review paper, we focus on structural imaging studies of language that have utilised behavioural measures in order to investigate the neural correlates of language skills in the undamaged brain. We report studies that have used two different techniques: voxel-based morphometry of whole brain grey or white matter images and diffusion tensor imaging. At present, there are relatively few structural imaging studies of language. We group them into those that investigated (1) the perception of novel speech sounds, (2) the links between speech sounds and their meaning, (3) speech production, and (4) reading. We highlight the validity of the findings by comparing the results to those from functional imaging studies. Finally, we conclude by summarising the novel contribution of these studies to date and potential directions for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 216 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 28%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Professor 13 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 29 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 28%
Neuroscience 30 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Linguistics 14 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 45 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,652,837
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#489
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,169
of 114,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.