↓ Skip to main content

Advances in ovarian cancer therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
413 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
Title
Advances in ovarian cancer therapy
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3501-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander J. Cortez, Patrycja Tudrej, Katarzyna A. Kujawa, Katarzyna M. Lisowska

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Current state-of-the-art surgery and chemotherapy result in the high incidence of complete remissions; however, the recurrence rate is also high. For most patients, the disease eventually becomes a continuum of symptom-free periods and recurrence episodes. Different targeted treatment approaches and biological drugs, currently under development, bring the promise of turning ovarian cancer into a manageable chronic disease. In this review, we discuss the current standard in the therapy for ovarian cancer, major recent studies on the new variants of conventional therapies, and new therapeutic approaches, recently approved and/or in clinical trials. The latter include anti-angiogenic therapies, polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. We also discuss cost-effectiveness of some novel therapies and the issue of better selection of patients for personalized treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 513 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 16%
Student > Master 66 13%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 194 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 94 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 74 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 39 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 4%
Chemistry 20 4%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 205 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,982,970
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#96
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,586
of 449,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.