↓ Skip to main content

Pyrrolysine and Selenocysteine Use Dissimilar Decoding Strategies*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyrrolysine and Selenocysteine Use Dissimilar Decoding Strategies*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, March 2005
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m501458200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zhang, Pavel V. Baranov, John F. Atkins, Vadim N. Gladyshev

Abstract

Selenocysteine (Sec) and pyrrolysine (Pyl) are known as the 21st and 22nd amino acids in protein. Both are encoded by codons that normally function as stop signals. Sec specification by UGA codons requires the presence of a cis-acting selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) element. Similarly, it is thought that Pyl is inserted by UAG codons with the help of a putative pyrrolysine insertion sequence (PYLIS) element. Herein, we analyzed the occurrence of Pyl-utilizing organisms, Pyl-associated genes, and Pyl-containing proteins. The Pyl trait is restricted to several microbes, and only one organism has both Pyl and Sec. We found that methanogenic archaea that utilize Pyl have few genes that contain in-frame UAG codons, and many of these are followed with nearby UAA or UGA codons. In addition, unambiguous UAG stop signals could not be identified. This bias was not observed in Sec-utilizing organisms and non-Pyl-utilizing archaea, as well as with other stop codons. These observations as well as analyses of the coding potential of UAG codons, overlapping genes, and release factor sequences suggest that UAG is not a typical stop signal in Pyl-utilizing archaea. On the other hand, searches for conserved Pyl-containing proteins revealed only four protein families, including methylamine methyltransferases and transposases. Only methylamine methyltransferases matched the Pyl trait and had conserved Pyl, suggesting that this amino acid is used primarily by these enzymes. These findings are best explained by a model wherein UAG codons may have ambiguous meaning and Pyl insertion can effectively compete with translation termination for UAG codons obviating the need for a specific PYLIS structure. Thus, Sec and Pyl follow dissimilar decoding and evolutionary strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 136 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 34%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 25%
Chemistry 12 8%
Computer Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#12,344
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,681
of 74,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#95
of 633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.