↓ Skip to main content

National Estimates for Mental Health Mutual Support Groups, Self-Help Organizations, and Consumer-Operated Services

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
National Estimates for Mental Health Mutual Support Groups, Self-Help Organizations, and Consumer-Operated Services
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10488-005-0019-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid D. Goldstrom, Jean Campbell, Joseph A. Rogers, David B. Lambert, Beatrice Blacklow, Marilyn J. Henderson, Ronald W. Manderscheid

Abstract

The authors report on a 2002 national survey of mental health mutual support groups (MSG) and self-help organizations (SHO) run by and for mental health consumers and/or family members, and consumer-operated services (COS). They found 7,467 of these groups and organizations-3,315 MSGs, 3,019 SHOs, and 1,133 COSs-greatly eclipsing the number of traditional mental health organizations (4,546). MSGs reported that 41,363 people attended their last meetings. SHOs reported a total of 1,005,400 members. COSs reported serving 534,551 clients/members in 1 year. The array of services and supports provided within each of these types (MSG, SHO, COS) is reported, and implications for the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health recommendations are explicated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 38%
Social Sciences 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,143,329
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#139
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,641
of 60,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them