↓ Skip to main content

No Credible Scientific Evidence is Presented to Support Claims that Transgenic DNA was Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
No Credible Scientific Evidence is Presented to Support Claims that Transgenic DNA was Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico
Published in
Transgenic Research, February 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1013903300469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Christou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 2 4%
Denmark 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 63%
Environmental Science 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#366
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,988
of 123,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.