You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, November 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D Le Bihan, E Breton, D Lallemand, P Grenier, E Cabanis, M Laval-Jeantet |
| Abstract |
Molecular diffusion and microcirculation in the capillary network result in a distribution of phases in a single voxel in the presence of magnetic field gradients. This distribution produces a spin-echo attenuation. The authors have developed a magnetic resonance (MR) method to image such intravoxel incoherent motions (IVIMs) by using appropriate gradient pulses. Images were generated at 0.5 T in a high-resolution, multisection mode. Diffusion coefficients measured on images of water and acetone phantoms were consistent with published values. Images obtained in the neurologic area from healthy subjects and patients were analyzed in terms of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) incorporating the effect of all IVIMs. Differences were found between various normal and pathologic tissues. The ADC of in vivo water differed from the diffusion coefficient of pure water. Results were assessed in relation to water compartmentation in biologic tissues (restricted diffusion) and tissue perfusion. Nonuniform slow flow of cerebrospinal fluid appeared as a useful feature on IVIM images. Observation of these motions may significantly extend the diagnostic capabilities of MR imaging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 1% |
| Spain | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1063 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 266 | 23% |
| Researcher | 197 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 144 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 93 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 5% |
| Other | 190 | 17% |
| Unknown | 191 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 319 | 28% |
| Engineering | 153 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 110 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 96 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 59 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 11% |
| Unknown | 276 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,544,541
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#993
of 10,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152
of 11,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.