↓ Skip to main content

5th International Symposium on Multiple Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease: Global Assessment and Intervention, Venice (Italy), 28–31 October 1999

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
Title
5th International Symposium on Multiple Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease: Global Assessment and Intervention, Venice (Italy), 28–31 October 1999
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s000180050280
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,861
of 311,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#24
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.