↓ Skip to main content

Mercury: Magnetic field and interior

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, March 1978
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Mercury: Magnetic field and interior
Published in
Space Science Reviews, March 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf00240907
Authors

Norman F. Ness

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Researcher 5 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 70%
Physics and Astronomy 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#464
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,278
of 5,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them