↓ Skip to main content

Challenges of Multidimensional Outcome Reporting after Suburethral Mid Urethral Sling Removal

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 114)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges of Multidimensional Outcome Reporting after Suburethral Mid Urethral Sling Removal
Published in
The Journal of Urology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nabeel A. Shakir, Connie Wang, Nirmish Singla, Feras Alhalabi, Alana Christie, Gary E. Lemack, Philippe E. Zimmern

Abstract

To determine the types and frequency of presenting symptoms in women undergoing sub-urethral mid-urethral sling removal (SSR) towards improving outcome reporting post-SSR. Following IRB approval, women who underwent SSR of one MUS were evaluated for their presenting symptoms and correlation with the Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short form (UDI-6) questionnaire. Demographic data was recorded and patient-reported presenting symptoms were categorized into 5 domains: storage symptoms, voiding symptoms, pain, recurrent UTIs, or urinary incontinence (UI). The UDI-6 was reviewed preoperatively and at 6-12 months postoperatively. An ideal outcome, defined as resolution of incontinence, pain, resumption of sexual activity, and no need for further anti-incontinence procedures was also calculated. From 2006-2017, 230 women met study criteria of whom 116 had UDI-6 questionnaires completed postoperatively. The majority of women (80%) had three or more presenting symptoms, with pain being the most common. The most common combination of symptoms was all five domains (46/230, 20%). Increasing number of symptoms was correlated with total preoperative UDI-6 score, and symptom domains were associated with their corresponding UDI-6 sub-domain questions. Domains not covered by UDI-6 i.e. recurrent UTIs and dyspareunia, accounted for 27% of reported symptoms. Due to limited data on sexual activity, an ideal outcome was reached in 10% of patients, but was at 40% once sexual activity information was excluded. In this series, the presenting symptoms of women undergoing SSR were manifold. The UDI-6 questionnaire correlated with many of these complaints and may be used in outcome analysis in conjunction with self-reported symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Psychology 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,629,114
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#20
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,411
of 452,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them