↓ Skip to main content

Tantalsäure, Niobsäure, (Ilmensäure) und Titansäure

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 1866
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
29 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Tantalsäure, Niobsäure, (Ilmensäure) und Titansäure
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 1866
DOI 10.1007/bf01302537
Authors

Marignac, Blomstrand, H. Deville, L. Troost, R. Hermann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 40%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them