| Title |
Sunscreen Safety: The Precautionary Principle, The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and Nanoparticles in Sunscreens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NanoEthics, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-008-0041-z |
| Authors |
Thomas Faunce, Katherine Murray, Hitoshi Nasu, Diana Bowman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 38% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#87
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,816
of 81,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them