| Title |
Nanostructured ceramics in medical devices: Applications and prospects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-004-0289-x |
| Authors |
Roger J. Narayan, Prashant N. Kumta, Charles Sfeir, Dong-Hyun Lee, Daiwon Choi, Dana Olton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 23% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#132
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,439
of 62,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them