↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of metallic piercings that caused adverse reactions during use

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 116)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of metallic piercings that caused adverse reactions during use
Published in
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, August 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02715453
Authors

C. R. F. Azevedo, G. Spera, A. P. Silva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 33%
Design 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#25
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,693
of 48,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them