↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and a reconsideration of existing sociosexual models

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, June 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and a reconsideration of existing sociosexual models
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, June 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02736392
Authors

Chris L. Schürmann, Jan A. R. A. M. van Hooff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#551
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,979
of 10,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them